March 5, 2026

The Sports Report: Streaming vs Linear with Ross Benes, Senior Analyst @ EMARKETER

The player is loading ...

Have a question? Send us a text! DOWNLOAD THE EMARKETER SPORTS VIEWERSHIP REPORT REFERENCED IN THIS EPISODE HERE: https://podcast.stateofstreaming.com/downloads/the-sports-report/ In this episode, Tim Rowe sits down with Ross Benes, Senior Analyst at EMARKETER, to separate the hype from reality in sports streaming. Ross's research reveals a striking disconnect: while streaming dominates nearly two-thirds of total TV screen time, live sports viewing on streaming platforms accounts for just 10%...

Have a question? Send us a text!

DOWNLOAD THE EMARKETER SPORTS VIEWERSHIP REPORT REFERENCED IN THIS EPISODE HERE: https://podcast.stateofstreaming.com/downloads/the-sports-report/

In this episode, Tim Rowe sits down with Ross Benes, Senior Analyst at EMARKETER, to separate the hype from reality in sports streaming. Ross's research reveals a striking disconnect: while streaming dominates nearly two-thirds of total TV screen time, live sports viewing on streaming platforms accounts for just 10% of minutes watched. The conversation covers the sports rights bubble, the future of regional sports networks, and why niche streaming might be the most exciting frontier in the space.

Key Takeaways

Sports Streaming Is Massive In Buzz, Not In Minutes Most sports viewers have watched something on a streaming service, but they're not doing it regularly. On-demand platforms like Peacock, Paramount+, and Prime Video account for roughly 10% of sports viewing time, while digital pay TV services like YouTube TV and Hulu + Live TV make up another 20%. The remaining two-thirds still flows through traditional cable packages.

5:19 – Why streaming's share of sports viewing is a fraction of its share of total TV time.
8:35 – How vMVPDs blur the line between streaming and cable, and why the distinction matters for advertisers.

The Sports Rights Bubble Is Real, For Some The NBA's media rights deal jumped from $2.7B to $6.9B. MLS tripled its rights payments but lost 65% of viewers after moving to Apple TV. Amazon and Apple can absorb sports as a loss leader because streaming is one piece of a larger business. But for platforms where ad revenue is the primary model, overpaying for rights with underwhelming viewership is a ticking clock.

12:50 – Why TNT walked away from the NBA deal and what that signals.
9:48 – The college basketball viewership reality, a St. John's game on Peacock likely doesn't crack 500K viewers.

Short-Term Revenue Grabs Versus Long-Term Fan Building Some teams are choosing reach over revenue, dropping paid RSN models in favor of free local broadcasts. Ross highlights NBA teams moving games to local affiliates instead of charging fans $6/month through cable networks, a bet on lifetime fan value over immediate subscription income.

17:40 – The NBA teams betting on accessibility over paywalls.
14:05 – Why RSNs survive for big-market teams but face extinction in smaller markets.

Niche Sports Streaming Is Quietly Expanding Access The most underrated story in sports streaming isn't the NFL or NBA, it's the long tail. Platforms like FloSports and Big Ten Plus now make it possible to watch Penn State wrestling, college volleyball, and semi-pro hockey on your TV. The question is whether discoverability and revenue can catch up to availability.

21:50 – FloSports, Big Ten Plus, and the explosion of niche sports content.
16:28 – The Roku Channel carrying League One volleyball and why cheap rights don't guarantee an audience.

Connect with the Guest

Connect with Ross Benes on LinkedIn: Ross Benes
Email: rbenes@emarketer.com

00:00 - The Real State Of Sports Streaming

02:11 - Meet Ross Benes And His 1999 Thesis

04:14 - Where Sports Minutes Are Actually Watched

07:30 - Decoding VMVPDs And Digital Pay TV

11:45 - Are Sports Rights Becoming A Bubble

16:35 - Short Term Revenue Versus Long Term Fandom

20:45 - The Niche Boom And Discovery Problem

WEBVTT

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:13.199
Sports streaming is the hottest ticket in media, but did you know that as much as 90% of sports streaming attention as in minutes watched is actually still happening on linear television via streaming apps like YouTube TV and FUBO?

00:00:13.599 --> 00:00:32.159
For example, the NFL has media rights agreements with ESPN, ABC, CVS, Paramount Plus, Fox, Fox One, NBC, Peacock, Amazon Prime, YouTube, and Netflix, which can cost the average consumer as much as$1,500 a year to watch their favorite sport, according to a recent USA Today study.

00:00:32.320 --> 00:00:45.439
And just two weeks ago, on February 25th, the FCC issued a public notice for comment on sports broadcasting practices and marketplace developments, highlighting the rift that everyone feels, from advertisers to casual fans.

00:00:45.679 --> 00:00:47.600
Welcome back to the Stave Streaming Podcast.

00:00:47.679 --> 00:00:53.439
I'm your host, Tim Rowe, and today I'm joined by one of the most qualified analysts on TV and streaming.

00:00:53.520 --> 00:00:56.719
That's Ross Bettish, senior analyst at eMarketer.

00:00:57.039 --> 00:00:57.920
Enjoy.

00:01:05.120 --> 00:01:07.200
Ross Bettish, eMarketer.

00:01:07.439 --> 00:01:16.719
You reached out and you had some really interesting research about sports, about streaming, and about really, there's there's a big delta.

00:01:16.799 --> 00:01:24.159
There's a there's a big spread between eyeballs, attention, and kind of the the truth behind the sports streaming narrative.

00:01:24.239 --> 00:01:26.239
Ross, thanks so much for being on the podcast.

00:01:26.560 --> 00:01:27.760
Hey, thanks for having me on.

00:01:27.840 --> 00:01:29.840
And I'm always down to talk about sports.

00:01:30.079 --> 00:01:30.319
Yeah.

00:01:30.480 --> 00:01:41.280
No, this is this is a good place to talk about sports, and we'll tie it back to the most important uh theme of the day, which is streaming, which is television advertising, so that we can we can write this off as a business launch.

00:01:41.439 --> 00:01:48.079
Uh you released a book that I think is actually the perfect launch point for today's conversation.

00:01:48.159 --> 00:01:58.159
You wrote a book, you published a book last year, 1999, the year that the year low culture conquered America and kickstarted our bizarre times.

00:01:58.400 --> 00:02:03.040
You want to tell us a little bit about that book and then uh we'll talk about sports streaming?

00:02:03.439 --> 00:02:04.560
Well, yeah.

00:02:04.799 --> 00:02:20.240
So in that book, I just make the case that all the trashy entertainment from the late 90s, like the pro wrestling attitude era, the insane clown posse taking off, and the beanie baby mania was a sign of what was to come in our our current age.

00:02:20.319 --> 00:02:27.520
So I just find that the trash from a quarter century ago shapes our world in some very unusual ways.

00:02:27.599 --> 00:02:32.319
And a lot of it comes from what was very popular on television at the time.

00:02:32.400 --> 00:02:35.120
You know, we're we're living in a Jerry Springer world.

00:02:35.680 --> 00:02:37.280
In more ways than one.

00:02:37.439 --> 00:02:39.120
And uh, and we'll talk about that.

00:02:39.280 --> 00:02:41.360
But let's talk about the sports research.

00:02:41.439 --> 00:02:56.639
And I think that as we go through this, the reason that your your book from last year stands out in this conversation is more leagues are are really branching into a global audience, the the clip culture of sports of athletics.

00:02:56.719 --> 00:03:05.199
There was a lot of debate about the the NBA all-star uh dunk contest and kind of just the quality of sports programming.

00:03:05.280 --> 00:03:11.280
It seems like there's a pretty broad broad spectrum of that, and a lot of what's driving it is the way that we consume.

00:03:11.439 --> 00:03:18.560
What did your research find about the way that we consume sports as it relates to streaming TV?

00:03:18.800 --> 00:03:23.120
Well, the time spent on sports is still predominantly with linear TV.

00:03:23.199 --> 00:03:28.319
So, like streaming is what obviously it gets people's attention, and that's where the growth is.

00:03:28.479 --> 00:03:36.800
You know, streaming's coming from being like nothing, you know, 15, 20 years ago to a sizable portion of the audience now, but it's it's not a lot of time spent.

00:03:36.960 --> 00:03:44.560
So what we see is most sports viewers will watch sports on a streaming service, so it has a lot of viewers, but they're not regularly doing so.

00:03:44.719 --> 00:03:51.439
You know, you might watch like the the Jake Paul Tyson match, or you might watch some Peacock basketball.

00:03:51.599 --> 00:04:02.400
But when we look at data um from Inkscape, for instance, we see that on-demand streaming services are only about 10% of time spent with sports.

00:04:02.639 --> 00:04:05.919
The other two-thirds is going to you know cable packages.

00:04:06.080 --> 00:04:11.439
Now, if you include VMVPDs as streaming, then the streaming share is is more like a third.

00:04:11.680 --> 00:04:18.319
But I I would argue that even though VMVPDs deliver it digitally, you still have to subscribe to the TV networks.

00:04:18.399 --> 00:04:22.959
Like you're still watching it on ABC or on Fox Sports or FS1 or whatever.

00:04:23.199 --> 00:04:27.519
The advertising is still linear TV for all intents and purposes.

00:04:27.759 --> 00:04:44.000
But um that that's just such a big gap because streaming accounts for almost two-thirds of time spent with the TV screen in general, but then with live sports, it shrinks down to like a tenth, and that's gonna change, but um, it is where it is right now.

00:04:44.319 --> 00:04:50.240
And to help our audience with some of the nomenclature of VM VMPD, right?

00:04:50.399 --> 00:04:53.120
Even even the acronyms are sometimes hard to get out.

00:04:53.279 --> 00:04:54.399
What yeah, it's a terrible one.

00:04:54.800 --> 00:04:55.279
It really is.

00:04:55.439 --> 00:04:56.240
What what is that?

00:04:56.319 --> 00:05:01.120
Who are some of the the popular streaming apps that we would know fall into that category?

00:05:01.439 --> 00:05:05.519
Yeah, so a VMVPD, we don't even need to spell it out, it's so stupid.

00:05:05.680 --> 00:05:09.199
Um, it's you know, like we're killing it today, it's done.

00:05:09.439 --> 00:05:19.759
Yeah, it's uh uh we've tried to kill it with uh we call it actually digital pay TV, is what we call it, but that hasn't caught on broadly, so I'm using this other term because people probably know what it is.

00:05:19.839 --> 00:05:25.839
But it it's digital cable, it's Hulu at Live TV, YouTube TV, FUBO.

00:05:26.240 --> 00:05:36.319
You're paying for a package of TV networks, but it's done through a streaming service, and there is a lot of sports watching on that, that's about 20%.

00:05:36.959 --> 00:05:53.279
So, you know, it's like double what is on Paramount Plus, Peacock, Netflix, Prime Video, because it's just retransmitting what TV stations people have been watching for decades, and that's kind of the main purpose why people use those services.

00:05:53.439 --> 00:06:00.720
Like, if you look after football season, they'll report quarterly losses on those services, like all the companies that have them.

00:06:01.040 --> 00:06:06.240
Yeah, so so that that category is like incrementally grown, but it doesn't grow quarter over quarter.

00:06:06.399 --> 00:06:09.439
It like it grows at the start of certain seasons.

00:06:09.600 --> 00:06:21.040
It's very like they lose subscribers um the end of football season, you know, during baseball season, that doesn't have quite the appeal uh because that's more of an RSN um regional sports network-driven business.

00:06:21.199 --> 00:06:32.319
So, you know, people who want to watch that have to go to the MLB TV package or to their individual RSNs, like um Gotham Sports app, if you're if you're a Yankees fan, for instance.

00:06:32.639 --> 00:06:38.959
But the the VMVPDs, you know, they have their little niche, but that they they haven't really gone beyond that.

00:06:39.120 --> 00:06:48.720
So, like what what I guess I get when I'm researching all this stuff is a lot of the viewers who are counted as digital viewers of live sports are pretty casual.

00:06:48.959 --> 00:06:51.920
Most people aren't predominantly watching live sports that way.

00:06:52.079 --> 00:06:52.560
I do.

00:06:52.720 --> 00:06:59.519
I'm sure others who are listening to a streaming podcast do, but that's not the behavior in the general population.

00:06:59.680 --> 00:07:04.000
The general population is still to find out those TV networks and watch that way.

00:07:04.079 --> 00:07:10.879
And the TV networks hold the rights to like the lot of the greatest stuff still, so you can't totally get around it yet.

00:07:11.199 --> 00:07:12.240
Let's talk about that.

00:07:12.399 --> 00:07:39.360
Let's talk about the rights because Michael Beach from the State of Screens put out a piece earlier this week actually that sports could be a bubble, that that's the sports rights industry starting to look a little bit like a bubble, and we look at how much the streaming apps are actually paying to compete for these rights relative to the number of minutes of ads per hour, and kind of you you start to break down the math.

00:07:39.759 --> 00:07:41.839
Doesn't seem like the math is all the way there.

00:07:41.920 --> 00:07:44.480
Are you are you seeing anything similar in your research?

00:07:44.720 --> 00:07:50.959
I I felt that way for a little while now because the the rights have just increased at such an exorbitant rate.

00:07:51.199 --> 00:07:55.040
Like that NBA deal that was renewed last year.

00:07:55.759 --> 00:08:01.519
Six point nine billion, up from two point seven billion to six point nine billion.

00:08:01.759 --> 00:08:02.399
Yeah.

00:08:02.879 --> 00:08:11.920
Yeah, so like it, you know, I I can I get why TNT, you know, didn't want to play ball, like at first, because that's just a a crazy amount of money.

00:08:12.160 --> 00:08:22.240
Or if we even go on a smaller scale, like Peacock, which doesn't have you know a lot of subscribers, they're you know, they're kind of towards the bottom of the Nielsen gauge.

00:08:22.399 --> 00:08:28.959
They pay a lot of money to like the Big Ten in the in the Big East to have streaming exclusives, and they don't release data.

00:08:29.040 --> 00:08:32.240
But I you know I'd be surprised if like a St.

00:08:32.480 --> 00:08:37.200
John's game on Peacock is even bringing in 500,000 viewers.

00:08:37.360 --> 00:08:42.720
Because like a college basketball game on FS1 usually doesn't like it's gotta be a good game to crack a million.

00:08:43.039 --> 00:08:49.840
The kid streaming the game on TikTok that he's watching in his dorm room probably has as many viewers or more.

00:08:50.159 --> 00:09:09.360
But they're paying a lot of money for so I I do wonder like some companies can take it as a loss, like like Amazon, they probably honestly don't care that much if they lose money on the NBA because didn't even feel it then feel it, and they're they're bringing more people into Amazon and just increasing awareness for Amazon in tandem with the NBA, so there's a halo effect there.

00:09:09.519 --> 00:09:23.360
But like Apple TV paying for MLB or like Peacock with Big East basketball, if you're having peanuts for viewers, those those losses eventually well, Apple's another one that doesn't probably care if they eventually add up.

00:09:23.440 --> 00:09:33.120
But um, you know, with Peacock and then with with Paramount coming with these UFC matches, like they're not gonna get like you know 40 million people to watch all these fights.

00:09:33.360 --> 00:09:36.559
The math makes it seem like it's gonna be a loss leader on some of these.

00:09:36.799 --> 00:09:44.159
Yeah, the the math is definitely tough, but I think then to your point, Ross, is looking more fundamentally at the company itself.

00:09:44.480 --> 00:09:47.279
Is Amazon a streaming TV app?

00:09:47.600 --> 00:09:50.879
No, streaming TV is a component of the thing that they do, right?

00:09:50.960 --> 00:09:53.200
They print money from from AWS.

00:09:53.360 --> 00:09:55.519
Is is Netflix a streaming app?

00:09:55.600 --> 00:09:56.159
Yes, right.

00:09:56.240 --> 00:09:59.519
They they have to make money in a fundamentally different way.

00:09:59.759 --> 00:10:02.879
So as we're looking at these things, I think keeping those things in mind, right?

00:10:02.960 --> 00:10:10.720
The MLS tripled their annual rights payments, but lost 65% of viewers after after moving to Apple TV.

00:10:11.039 --> 00:10:15.919
Um, just really interesting stuff that we'll continue to keep an eye on.

00:10:16.080 --> 00:10:19.200
What are you most excited about in the research?

00:10:19.360 --> 00:10:23.519
What things stood out to you that that excited you the most?

00:10:23.759 --> 00:10:26.080
Well, one, yeah, something you just alluded to.

00:10:26.240 --> 00:10:41.440
I like seeing the trade-off between like short-term, we gotta just increase our subscription revenue and our retransfees at all costs, and then long-term thinking of like, we'll give up some of that if we reach more people who we want to have as our long-term fan base.

00:10:41.679 --> 00:10:49.759
Like, I'm thinking of all those NBA teams that said, we're not gonna use a cable network that charges our subscribers, you know, charges our fans$6 a month.

00:10:49.840 --> 00:10:59.120
We're just gonna put it on our local affiliate so we can have more fans and hopefully get them to come to the games and buy the merchandise and and like become lifelong Utah Jazz fans.

00:10:59.200 --> 00:11:00.320
That that excites me.

00:11:00.480 --> 00:11:07.919
Another thing that excites me, even though it often pisses me off more, is the breadth of what's available has greatly increased.

00:11:08.000 --> 00:11:12.080
Now, that means sometimes it's very hard to find like what you want to watch.

00:11:12.159 --> 00:11:14.639
Like even something as mainstream as the Yankees.

00:11:14.799 --> 00:11:23.840
You might have to go to the Yankees' website that day and be like, are they on Yes Network or is it on NBC that day, or is it on Apple TV?

00:11:24.000 --> 00:11:24.799
Like, who knows?

00:11:24.879 --> 00:11:26.159
Because it changes every game.

00:11:26.240 --> 00:11:31.679
And that's and it's not even like a regular cadence, like um, you know, Sunday Night Football's on NBC.

00:11:31.759 --> 00:11:35.440
It's like Amazon Prime could just grab a game whenever they want to.

00:11:35.600 --> 00:11:40.639
You have to pay attention, but everything is there if you are willing to pay for it.

00:11:40.720 --> 00:11:43.519
And and for tertiary sports, that wasn't always the case.

00:11:43.679 --> 00:11:46.639
So like I like seeing things like flow sports.

00:11:46.720 --> 00:11:49.039
I don't know if people are familiar with it, but tell us about flow.

00:11:49.360 --> 00:11:51.600
Well, it's just kind of a niche streaming service.

00:11:51.759 --> 00:12:00.480
Um, you know, you pay a monthly fee and you can get access to like all sorts of college and even high school sports that wouldn't be on there otherwise.

00:12:00.559 --> 00:12:03.039
Uh Big Ten Plus is another example.

00:12:03.200 --> 00:12:08.399
Like, if you want or if you're really a big fan of Penn State Wrestling, and Penn State Wrestling is huge.

00:12:08.480 --> 00:12:14.320
They've won like, I don't know, Kale Sanderson's won probably like six national titles since he's been coached there.

00:12:14.399 --> 00:12:16.080
Like they they then they're unbelievable.

00:12:16.240 --> 00:12:18.320
But that's not on national TV normally.

00:12:18.399 --> 00:12:20.080
But now you can watch it if you want.

00:12:20.320 --> 00:12:29.440
You you know, you can watch college volleyball and college gymnastics, and you you you can find lower level semi-pro hockey if you if you want to go search for it.

00:12:29.759 --> 00:12:35.120
That was basically limited to radio broadcasts in the past.

00:12:35.360 --> 00:12:47.679
So while streaming comes with the frustration at the high level of like, man, I just want to watch my team and I gotta figure out where I'm gonna do that, and I also have to probably pay five people to do it.

00:12:47.840 --> 00:12:48.799
That's annoying.

00:12:48.960 --> 00:12:59.200
But if you're into a sport that isn't one of the big four, you can put it on your TV screen and watch it live with a uh way you you wouldn't have been able to ever do so before.

00:12:59.519 --> 00:13:05.039
Are regional sports networks survivable as a business model, or is it this pivot to niche?

00:13:05.120 --> 00:13:06.320
Is it team access?

00:13:06.480 --> 00:13:09.440
Like, do you have a take on how this all plays out?

00:13:09.840 --> 00:13:11.759
Well, yeah, it it's it's gonna be a mess.

00:13:11.840 --> 00:13:16.240
I I think regional sports networks survive for the strongest teams.

00:13:16.480 --> 00:13:32.799
If you are um, you know, the Spectrum LA Dodgers channel or like MSG, you're in this huge market, you have such a large built-in fan base, you can financially profit through an RSN probably indefinitely.

00:13:33.039 --> 00:13:47.440
But like the Atlanta Braves or like the Utah Jazz, you know, teams in in smaller markets whose like salary role isn't always at the top, so like you know, they're not gonna be able to compete for the playoffs every single year, that's a lot harder.

00:13:47.600 --> 00:13:53.120
And a lot of those are dying off, and they were relying on a um a model that you know just doesn't work.

00:13:53.200 --> 00:14:01.600
Like if you if you're relying on cable subscribers who aren't actually going to watch your channel but just pay into it, well, that doesn't really work in an era of cord cutting.

00:14:01.679 --> 00:14:03.360
So for them, they have to figure out something.

00:14:03.440 --> 00:14:14.399
So I think there's gonna be more league control for MLB, MBA, NHL, for the franchises who um are unable to make it go themselves.

00:14:14.559 --> 00:14:25.360
And there's gonna be some pushback though, because those giants like the Dodgers and the Yankees and the Knicks, they're not gonna want to give up that control because it benefits them to be in the old system.

00:14:25.679 --> 00:14:34.159
So that's something that's probably gonna come up in collective bargaining agreements for all these leagues when they like you know renew with their with their unions.

00:14:34.399 --> 00:14:38.639
And then with the niche, it's just kind of spaghetti on the wall right now.

00:14:38.799 --> 00:14:47.679
Like, you know, the Roku channel has League One volleyball, which is one of three pro volleyball leagues um that are running in the United States right now.

00:14:47.840 --> 00:14:51.120
Like if you want, if you want to, you know, watch that, that's great.

00:14:51.440 --> 00:15:04.159
But I don't know how good the discoverability is or how many built-in fans there already are that even though it's cheap, the rights cost nothing, and it's cheap to pretty much just film that with one or two cameras and put it on the Roku channel.

00:15:04.320 --> 00:15:09.120
I I don't know if there's gonna be enough revenue there to like drive serious investment.

00:15:09.440 --> 00:15:12.960
So um, you know, it's the same with all those sports that are on big plus.

00:15:13.440 --> 00:15:22.240
And it's it's tough to know which ones will actually drive anything for for revenue or which ones are just there as an experiment.

00:15:22.559 --> 00:15:24.080
It's a fun time to experiment.

00:15:24.159 --> 00:15:29.360
There are a lot of experiments out there, and what's cool is we've got this conversation on the record.

00:15:29.440 --> 00:15:34.320
So as time time goes on, we'll be able to look back and uh and and see what's happened.

00:15:34.399 --> 00:15:44.480
I want to share some stats uh from Michael Beach, State of Screens, about the sports rights bubble, kind of get your reaction to it to a few of these.

00:15:44.720 --> 00:15:48.559
Streaming services are only selling 10 to 20 percent of the inventory.

00:15:48.639 --> 00:15:53.360
You covered that in the open, uh, at roughly a quarter of the CPM.

00:15:53.440 --> 00:15:57.360
So it's less inventory and a lower CPM.

00:15:57.519 --> 00:16:05.039
Uh, let's see, streaming will hit 50% of TV ad impressions by 2030, but that's still four years away.

00:16:05.200 --> 00:16:07.519
Um, so still pretty far off.

00:16:07.840 --> 00:16:13.200
Yeah, that'd be probably three years after CTV exceeds TV and ad spend.

00:16:13.279 --> 00:16:15.200
So the impressions are definitely a lagging thing.

00:16:15.519 --> 00:16:16.080
Interesting.

00:16:16.240 --> 00:16:18.879
And then the yeah, impressions again growing.

00:16:18.960 --> 00:16:21.440
Uh while linear impressions fall.

00:16:21.679 --> 00:16:30.000
Could sports be an opportunity for linear to reclaim market share or to re reinvent the way that we think about the bundle?

00:16:30.639 --> 00:16:32.000
Is cable dead?

00:16:32.559 --> 00:16:41.120
I do think uh cable is um not dead yet, but unable to fully resuscitate itself from its decline.

00:16:41.279 --> 00:16:50.960
And uh but the thing that's keeping it from being dead, that is what you're talking about, is that the sports bundle.

00:16:51.120 --> 00:16:54.720
And they they keep thinking of new ways to to slice the bundle.

00:16:54.960 --> 00:17:01.759
I think one of the more interesting developments is is NBC killed the NBC sports network, the cable channel.

00:17:02.240 --> 00:17:16.240
Then they had all these Peacock exclusives, then it was like clear that well, you know, not everyone can like watch this Peacock exclusive, so let's put it back on the NBC sports channel and bring it back.

00:17:16.400 --> 00:17:22.079
So like those NBA doubleheaders are on the reintroduced channel.

00:17:22.240 --> 00:17:25.599
And same with some of those like big East basketball games.

00:17:25.920 --> 00:17:29.920
There's enough value in cable that they they brought that back.

00:17:30.079 --> 00:17:36.240
And that that's a that's a you know rare use case, perhaps, but that shows that cable isn't dead.

00:17:36.319 --> 00:17:40.400
Because if it is, why would you why would you bring back a sports network?

00:17:40.559 --> 00:17:46.880
You you need it for the audience reach because your streaming service alone isn't gonna deliver what advertisers want.

00:17:47.359 --> 00:17:59.519
At the same time as spinning off versant and versant appearing to run maybe a similar playbook, playbook themselves, and combining those uh streaming and and broadcast assets.

00:18:00.079 --> 00:18:12.559
Well, Ross, there's a lot here and probably enough for for a follow-up part two conversation, but it it wouldn't be a full podcast if we didn't spend some time talking about your book was featured in a movie.

00:18:12.799 --> 00:18:13.519
Is that right?

00:18:13.680 --> 00:18:16.000
Uh yeah, well, a documentary, yeah.

00:18:16.240 --> 00:18:16.559
Okay.

00:18:16.799 --> 00:18:19.759
Tell us about what was the documentary, where would we have seen it?

00:18:20.000 --> 00:18:22.240
It was Dirty Talk, it was the name of it.

00:18:22.319 --> 00:18:28.400
It was a docuseries on ABC, and it was also available on Hulu and Disney Plus.

00:18:28.480 --> 00:18:32.559
So if you're a streaming person, you know, Hulu and Disney Plus would be the way to look at it.

00:18:32.720 --> 00:18:43.039
And it goes in depth on how 90s talk shows like Jenny Jones, um Horaldo, Jerry Springer, Ricky Lake have shaped our society.

00:18:43.200 --> 00:18:45.519
So, like my book has a chapter on that.

00:18:45.599 --> 00:18:47.440
It's actually the opening chapter.

00:18:47.599 --> 00:18:49.440
That's how the showrunner found me.

00:18:49.519 --> 00:19:00.240
So, you know, I I'm in there as a talking head, but then they also talked to like Maury Povich and and um Montel, you know, all these like great names from that era.

00:19:00.400 --> 00:19:01.920
So it was a fun experience.

00:19:02.079 --> 00:19:11.200
You know, I had a lot of people who uh I haven't talked to in years reach out because they saw me on TV, which made me think, hey, there's people still watching ABC live.

00:19:11.359 --> 00:19:12.480
That's interesting.

00:19:12.720 --> 00:19:14.000
This stuff does work.

00:19:14.240 --> 00:19:20.960
If you put something on ABC, no matter what it is, there's still probably gonna be at least a million and a half people that tune in.

00:19:21.039 --> 00:19:23.680
Maybe maybe a third of them are sleeping, but you know, they're still there.

00:19:23.920 --> 00:19:27.920
One of them's my aunt, so so you'll definitely uh get a call from my aunt.

00:19:28.079 --> 00:19:32.880
All the heroes of being homesick, you got to spend time with uh with legends.

00:19:32.960 --> 00:19:33.759
That's awesome.

00:19:33.920 --> 00:19:36.799
And Ross, we got to spend time with a legend today.

00:19:37.039 --> 00:19:38.160
Thank you for being here.

00:19:38.240 --> 00:19:43.119
This has been a fun, insightful conversation, and I'm sure just the first of many.

00:19:43.279 --> 00:19:44.400
Thank you for being here, Ross.

00:19:44.559 --> 00:19:45.200
This is a good time.

00:19:45.279 --> 00:19:46.000
Thanks for having me on.

00:19:46.160 --> 00:19:46.480
Absolutely.

00:19:46.559 --> 00:19:51.519
If folks want to learn more about what you're working on, if they want to stay in touch with you, where should we go?

00:19:51.599 --> 00:19:52.960
Where are you most active on social?

00:19:53.119 --> 00:19:54.400
How do we stay in touch with your work?

00:19:54.720 --> 00:20:00.480
Yeah, so I'm I'm on you know, LinkedIn would probably be the easiest way in just you know, Ross Spanish backslash.

00:20:00.559 --> 00:20:03.039
I mean LinkedIn.com backslash ra spanish.

00:20:03.279 --> 00:20:04.240
Pretty easy to find me there.

00:20:04.319 --> 00:20:15.039
You know, same on Twitter, but if I'm I'm sharing more streaming research on LinkedIn, and then if you really want to shoot me a message, the easiest way would be uh R Benish at eMarketer.

00:20:15.119 --> 00:20:18.640
You know, emails my preferred method of communication because I'm a millennial.

00:20:18.799 --> 00:20:18.960
Cool.

00:20:19.119 --> 00:20:20.960
We'll make it all easy to find.

00:20:21.200 --> 00:20:26.799
So, regardless of your demographic age range, you'll be able to get in touch with Ross.

00:20:27.200 --> 00:20:28.400
Ross, thanks so much for being here.

00:20:28.559 --> 00:20:29.200
Hey, thank you.

00:20:29.359 --> 00:20:29.759
Absolutely.

00:20:29.839 --> 00:20:35.920
And if you join enjoyed this conversation, please share with a colleague or a client and start a conversation today.

00:20:36.079 --> 00:20:37.599
We'll see y'all next time.